head to head · open source

Soketi vs Workbench

Soketi has 5,634 GitHub stars, 363 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 1.5 years ago. Workbench has 442 stars, 43 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Soketi leads on adoption by 1,175% (5,634 vs 442 stars). Soketi is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Workbench is written in TypeScript under MIT. Soketi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Workbench 10%. Workbench was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (nodejs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Soketi ★ 5.6K Workbench ★ 442 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Soketi Workbench
GitHub stars ★ 5.6K ★ 442
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2025-03-03 2026-06-01
Forks ⑂ 363 ⑂ 43
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Soketi if

  • You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Soketi profile →

pick Workbench if

  • You want the Workbench feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Workbench fits your workflow better

full Workbench profile →

About Soketi

Soketi is an open source, Pusher compatible WebSockets server written in TypeScript that lets developers run their own real time channels infrastructure instead of paying for a hosted Pusher plan.

read the full Soketi overview →

About Workbench

Workbench is an open source, MIT licensed dashboard for BullMQ that lets Node.js and Bun teams inspect, debug, and replay Redis backed job queues from inside their own backend, behind their own authentication.

read the full Workbench overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs workbench soketi vs timeplus automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

Soketi vs AutoMQ Soketi vs Timeplus Soketi vs Sequin Soketi vs Trench Soketi vs Hook0 Soketi vs Operational

Frequently asked questions

Is Soketi or Workbench more popular?

Soketi has 5,634 GitHub stars and Workbench has 442. Soketi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Soketi and Workbench free?

Both are open source. Soketi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Workbench under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Soketi and Workbench?

Soketi is written in TypeScript and Workbench in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Soketi or Workbench?

Choose Soketi if you want the larger community (5,634 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Workbench if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.