head to head · open source

Soketi vs Timeplus

Soketi has 5,634 GitHub stars, 363 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 1.5 years ago. Timeplus has 2,260 stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Soketi leads on adoption by 149% (5,634 vs 2,260 stars). Soketi is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. Soketi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Timeplus 5%. Timeplus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (real-time), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Soketi ★ 5.6K Timeplus ★ 2.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Soketi Timeplus
GitHub stars ★ 5.6K ★ 2.3K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript C++
Last push 2025-03-03 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 363 ⑂ 112
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Soketi if

  • You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Soketi profile →

pick Timeplus if

  • You want the Timeplus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Timeplus fits your workflow better

full Timeplus profile →

About Soketi

Soketi is an open source, Pusher compatible WebSockets server written in TypeScript that lets developers run their own real time channels infrastructure instead of paying for a hosted Pusher plan.

read the full Soketi overview →

About Timeplus

Timeplus Proton is an open source stream processing engine written in C++ and released under the Apache 2.0 license. It is presented as a single binary SQL pipeline engine for real time analytics, observability, ETL, and AI context. It lives in the messaging and event streaming ecosystem, with topic links to Kafka, ClickHouse, Flink, ksqlDB, Iceberg, and observability.

read the full Timeplus overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

automq vs soketi automq vs timeplus automq vs sequin automq vs trench automq vs hook0 automq vs operational automq vs workbench uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus

More Messaging & Event Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.

Soketi vs AutoMQ Soketi vs Sequin Soketi vs Trench Soketi vs Hook0 Soketi vs Operational Soketi vs Workbench

Frequently asked questions

Is Soketi or Timeplus more popular?

Soketi has 5,634 GitHub stars and Timeplus has 2,260. Soketi has the larger community by that measure.

Are Soketi and Timeplus free?

Both are open source. Soketi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Timeplus under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Soketi and Timeplus?

Soketi is written in TypeScript and Timeplus in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Soketi or Timeplus?

Choose Soketi if you want the larger community (5,634 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Timeplus if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.