head to head · open source
Soketi vs Timeplus
Soketi has 5,633 GitHub stars, 364 forks, 142 open issues and last shipped 1.7 years ago. Timeplus has 2,280 stars, 112 forks, 77 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Soketi leads on adoption by 147% (5,633 vs 2,280 stars). Soketi is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Timeplus is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. Soketi has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Timeplus 5%. Timeplus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (real-time), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Soketi | Timeplus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.6K | ★ 2.3K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | C++ |
| Last push | 2025-03-03 | 2026-10-30 |
| Forks | ⑂ 364 | ⑂ 112 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Soketi if
- You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Timeplus if
- You want the Timeplus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You evaluated both and Timeplus fits your workflow better
About Soketi
soketi Next gen, Pusher compatible, open source WebSockets server. Simple, fast, and resilient. 📣 🤝 Supporting Soketi is meant to be open source, forever and ever. It solves issues that many developers face the one of wanting to be limitless while testing locally or performing benchmarks. More than that, itt is also suited for production usage, either it is public for your frontend applications or internal to your team. The frequency of releases and maintenance is based on the available time, which is tight as hell. Recently, there were issues with the maintenance and this caused infrequent updates, as well as…
read the full Soketi overview →
About Timeplus
Fastest SQL pipeline engine for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI What's Timeplus Proton 🚀 The fastest SQL pipeline engine in a single C++ binary, for stream processing, analytics, observability and AI. A simple, fast and efficient alternative to ksqlDB and Apache Flink, powered by ClickHouse engine. 🔥 SQL for everything : Native source/sink (Kafka, ClickHouse, MySQL, Postgres, MongoDB, S3/Iceberg, OpenSearch etc.), Streaming ingestion, Multi stream JOINs, Incremental Materialized Views, Alerting, Tasks, UDF in Python/JS etc. ⚡ No JVM. No ZooKeeper. Zero dependencies. Just speed, control and…
read the full Timeplus overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Messaging & Event Streaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Messaging & Event Streaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Soketi or Timeplus more popular?
Soketi has 5,633 GitHub stars and Timeplus has 2,280. Soketi has the larger community by that measure.
Are Soketi and Timeplus free?
Both are open source. Soketi is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Timeplus under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Soketi and Timeplus?
Soketi is written in TypeScript and Timeplus in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Soketi or Timeplus?
Choose Soketi if you want the larger community (5,633 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Timeplus if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.