head to head · open source

integration vs ring

integration has 7,740 GitHub stars, 1,591 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ring has 1,523 stars, 213 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. integration leads on adoption by 408% (7,740 vs 1,523 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; ring is written in TypeScript under MIT. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, ring 14%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.7K ring ★ 1.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration ring
GitHub stars ★ 7.7K ★ 1.5K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 213
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick ring if

  • You want the ring feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and ring fits your workflow better

full ring profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

About ring

Ring is an unofficial, MIT licensed TypeScript project that packages interaction and automation for the majority of Ring doorbells, cameras, alarm systems and smart lighting, aimed at developers building their own Ring integrations and at homebridge users who want those devices inside Apple HomeKit.

read the full ring overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

integration vs Home Assistant integration vs frigate integration vs homebridge integration vs oomwoo integration vs espectre integration vs operating-system integration vs hass-xiaomi-miot integration vs CrateDB integration vs python-miio integration vs OpenMQTTGateway integration vs android integration vs domoticz

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or ring more popular?

integration has 7,740 GitHub stars and ring has 1,523. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and ring free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and ring under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and ring?

integration is written in Python and ring in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or ring?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,740 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ring if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.