head to head · open source

ring vs camera.ui

ring has 1,523 GitHub stars, 213 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. camera.ui has 1,114 stars, 167 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ring leads on adoption by 37% (1,523 vs 1,114 stars). ring is written in TypeScript under MIT; camera.ui is written in TypeScript under MIT. ring has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, camera.ui 15%. camera.ui was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (homekit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ring ★ 1.5K camera.ui ★ 1.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ring camera.ui
GitHub stars ★ 1.5K ★ 1.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 213 ⑂ 167
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ring if

  • You weight community size — 1.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ring profile →

pick camera.ui if

  • You want the camera.ui feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and camera.ui fits your workflow better

full camera.ui profile →

About ring

Ring is an unofficial, MIT licensed TypeScript project that packages interaction and automation for the majority of Ring doorbells, cameras, alarm systems and smart lighting, aimed at developers building their own Ring integrations and at homebridge users who want those devices inside Apple HomeKit.

read the full ring overview →

About camera.ui

camera.ui is a self hosted, local first video surveillance platform for security cameras, built for people who want live viewing, 24/7 recording, and on device AI detection while keeping footage on hardware they own.

read the full camera.ui overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

ring vs Home Assistant ring vs frigate ring vs homebridge ring vs oomwoo ring vs espectre ring vs integration ring vs operating-system ring vs hass-xiaomi-miot ring vs CrateDB ring vs python-miio ring vs OpenMQTTGateway ring vs android

Frequently asked questions

Is ring or camera.ui more popular?

ring has 1,523 GitHub stars and camera.ui has 1,114. ring has the larger community by that measure.

Are ring and camera.ui free?

Both are open source. ring is licensed under MIT and camera.ui under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ring and camera.ui?

ring is written in TypeScript and camera.ui in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ring or camera.ui?

Choose ring if you want the larger community (1,523 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose camera.ui if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.