head to head · open source

CrateDB vs ring

CrateDB has 4,438 GitHub stars, 618 forks, 332 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ring has 1,523 stars, 213 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CrateDB leads on adoption by 191% (4,438 vs 1,523 stars). CrateDB is written in Java under Apache-2.0; ring is written in TypeScript under MIT. CrateDB has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, ring 14%. CrateDB was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CrateDB ★ 4.4K ring ★ 1.5K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CrateDB ring
GitHub stars ★ 4.4K ★ 1.5K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 618 ⑂ 213
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CrateDB if

  • You weight community size — 4.4K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CrateDB profile →

pick ring if

  • You want the ring feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and ring fits your workflow better

full ring profile →

About CrateDB

CrateDB is a distributed, scalable SQL database built for storing and analyzing massive amounts of data in near real time, including complex queries. It is written in Java, licensed under Apache 2.0, and based on Lucene. The project combines the benefits of an SQL database with the scalability and flexibility typically associated with NoSQL databases, and it is PostgreSQL compatible, speaking the PostgreSQL wire protocol as well as offering an HTTP API. It lives in the analytics, big data, and IoT ecosystem, and the topic list places it alongside distributed SQL databases, Elasticsearch, industrial IoT, and IoT a…

read the full CrateDB overview →

About ring

Ring is an unofficial, MIT licensed TypeScript project that packages interaction and automation for the majority of Ring doorbells, cameras, alarm systems and smart lighting, aimed at developers building their own Ring integrations and at homebridge users who want those devices inside Apple HomeKit.

read the full ring overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs cratedb godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

CrateDB vs Home Assistant CrateDB vs frigate CrateDB vs homebridge CrateDB vs oomwoo CrateDB vs espectre CrateDB vs integration CrateDB vs operating-system CrateDB vs hass-xiaomi-miot CrateDB vs python-miio CrateDB vs OpenMQTTGateway CrateDB vs android CrateDB vs domoticz

Frequently asked questions

Is CrateDB or ring more popular?

CrateDB has 4,438 GitHub stars and ring has 1,523. CrateDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are CrateDB and ring free?

Both are open source. CrateDB is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ring under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CrateDB and ring?

CrateDB is written in Java and ring in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CrateDB or ring?

Choose CrateDB if you want the larger community (4,438 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ring if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.