head to head · open source

raylib vs aframe

raylib has 34,803 GitHub stars, 3,302 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. aframe has 17,635 stars, 4,396 forks, 338 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. raylib leads on adoption by 97% (34,803 vs 17,635 stars). raylib is written in C under Zlib; aframe is written in JavaScript under MIT. raylib has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, aframe 25%. raylib was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (game-development, game-engine, gamedev), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

raylib ★ 35K aframe ★ 18K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

raylib aframe
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 18K
License Zlib MIT
Written in C JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-07-13
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 4.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick raylib if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full raylib profile →

pick aframe if

  • You want the aframe feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and aframe fits your workflow better

full aframe profile →

About raylib

raylib is an open source, Zlib licensed C programming library for building videogames and graphical applications, aimed at programmers who would rather write code directly than work inside a visual game engine editor.

read the full raylib overview →

About aframe

A Frame is an MIT licensed JavaScript web framework built on top of three.js that lets anyone who can write HTML build browser based 3D, augmented reality and virtual reality experiences running on desktop, mobile and any WebXR capable headset.

read the full aframe overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

raylib vs Godot raylib vs three.js raylib vs imgui raylib vs bevy raylib vs GDevelop raylib vs Babylon.js raylib vs libgdx raylib vs MonoGame raylib vs Pumpkin raylib vs azerothcore-wotlk raylib vs zinx raylib vs colyseus

Frequently asked questions

Is raylib or aframe more popular?

raylib has 34,803 GitHub stars and aframe has 17,635. raylib has the larger community by that measure.

Are raylib and aframe free?

Both are open source. raylib is licensed under Zlib and aframe under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between raylib and aframe?

raylib is written in C and aframe in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, raylib or aframe?

Choose raylib if you want the larger community (34,803 stars) or its Zlib licence terms. Choose aframe if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.