head to head · open source

ant-design vs primitives

ant-design has 99,566 GitHub stars, 54,715 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped yesterday. primitives has 19,309 stars, 1,247 forks, 356 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 416% (99,566 vs 19,309 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; primitives is written in TypeScript under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, primitives 6%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (design-systems, react, ui-kit), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K primitives ★ 19K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design primitives
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 19K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-08-08
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick primitives if

  • You want the primitives feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and primitives fits your workflow better

full primitives profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About primitives

Radix Primitives is an MIT licensed, TypeScript UI component library for React, maintained by WorkOS, that gives teams building design systems and web apps low level components focused on accessibility, customization and developer experience.

read the full primitives overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs fleetbase open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs motion ant-design vs layui ant-design vs lottie-ios ant-design vs vant ant-design vs mojs ant-design vs Figma-Context-MCP

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or primitives more popular?

ant-design has 99,566 GitHub stars and primitives has 19,309. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and primitives free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and primitives under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and primitives?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and primitives in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or primitives?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,566 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose primitives if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.