head to head · open source
ant-design vs motion
ant-design has 100,046 GitHub stars, 54,644 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. motion has 34,813 stars, 1,497 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 187% (100,046 vs 34,813 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; motion is written in TypeScript under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, motion 4%. motion was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (react), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ant-design | motion | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 100K | ★ 35K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 55K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ant-design if
- You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick motion if
- You want the motion feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and motion fits your workflow better
About ant-design
Ant Design An enterprise class UI design language and React UI library. [![CI status][github action image]][github action url] [![codecov][codecov image]][codecov url] [![NPM version][npm image]][npm url] [![NPM downloads][download image]][download url] [![][bundlephobia image]][bundlephobia url] [![][jsdelivr image]][jsdelivr url] [![Follow Twitter][twitter image]][twitter url] [![dumi][dumi image]][dumi url] [![FOSSA Status][fossa image]][fossa url] [![Issues need help][help wanted image]][help wanted url] [![LFX Active Contributors][lfx image]][lfx url] Changelog · [Report Bug][github issues url] · [Request…
read the full ant-design overview →
About motion
Motion An open source animation library for JavaScript, React and Vue Table of Contents 1. Why Motion? 2. 🍦 Platforms 3. 🎓 Examples 4. ⚡️ Motion+ 5. 👩🏻⚖️ License 6. 💎 Contribute 7. ✨ Sponsors Why Motion? Simple API: First class React, JavaScript, and Vue packages. Hybrid engine: Power of JavaScript combined with native browser APIs for 120fps, GPU accelerated animations. Production ready: TypeScript, extensive test suite, tree shakable, tiny footprint. Batteries included: Gestures, springs, layout transitions, scroll linked effects, timelines. 🍦 Platforms Motion is available for React, JavaScript and Vue…
read the full motion overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ant-design or motion more popular?
ant-design has 100,046 GitHub stars and motion has 34,813. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.
Are ant-design and motion free?
Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and motion under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ant-design and motion?
ant-design is written in TypeScript and motion in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ant-design or motion?
Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (100,046 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose motion if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.