head to head · open source

ant-design vs lottie-ios

ant-design has 99,552 GitHub stars, 54,716 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped today. lottie-ios has 26,881 stars, 3,840 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ant-design leads on adoption by 270% (99,552 vs 26,881 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; lottie-ios is written in Swift under Apache-2.0. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, lottie-ios 14%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K lottie-ios ★ 27K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design lottie-ios
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 27K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 3.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick lottie-ios if

  • You want the lottie-ios feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and lottie-ios fits your workflow better

full lottie-ios profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About lottie-ios

Lottie for iOS is an Apache 2.0 Swift library that natively renders After Effects and bodymovin JSON vector animations in realtime on iOS, macOS, tvOS, and visionOS, and it is aimed at Apple platform developers who want to ship designer authored motion without rebuilding it by hand in code.

read the full lottie-ios overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs motion ant-design vs layui ant-design vs vant ant-design vs Figma-Context-MCP ant-design vs Tkinter-Designer ant-design vs pencil

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or lottie-ios more popular?

ant-design has 99,552 GitHub stars and lottie-ios has 26,881. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and lottie-ios free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and lottie-ios under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and lottie-ios?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and lottie-ios in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or lottie-ios?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,552 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lottie-ios if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.