head to head · open source

open-multi-agent vs coze-loop

open-multi-agent has 6,943 GitHub stars, 2,433 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. coze-loop has 5,739 stars, 795 forks, 84 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. open-multi-agent leads on adoption by 21% (6,943 vs 5,739 stars). open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript under MIT; coze-loop is written in Go under Apache-2.0. open-multi-agent has attracted 35% as many forks as stars, coze-loop 14%. open-multi-agent was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-multi-agent ★ 6.9K coze-loop ★ 5.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-multi-agent coze-loop
GitHub stars ★ 6.9K ★ 5.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 795
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-multi-agent if

  • You weight community size — 6.9K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-multi-agent profile →

pick coze-loop if

  • You want the coze-loop feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and coze-loop fits your workflow better

full coze-loop profile →

About open-multi-agent

OMA (Open Multi Agent) is a self hosted TypeScript agent runtime for teams that need consequential agent actions to wait for durable, tamper evident approvals and every run to leave a record that can be verified offline, byte for byte.

read the full open-multi-agent overview →

About coze-loop

Coze Loop is a developer oriented, open source, platform level solution for the full lifecycle management of AI agents — covering prompt development, debugging, evaluation, and observability — aimed at developers and teams who build and operate AI agents.

read the full coze-loop overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

open-multi-agent vs Uptime Kuma open-multi-agent vs worldmonitor open-multi-agent vs NetData open-multi-agent vs Grafana open-multi-agent vs huginn open-multi-agent vs Sentry open-multi-agent vs SigNoz open-multi-agent vs Grafana Loki open-multi-agent vs beszel open-multi-agent vs cilium open-multi-agent vs Apache SkyWalking open-multi-agent vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is open-multi-agent or coze-loop more popular?

open-multi-agent has 6,943 GitHub stars and coze-loop has 5,739. open-multi-agent has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-multi-agent and coze-loop free?

Both are open source. open-multi-agent is licensed under MIT and coze-loop under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between open-multi-agent and coze-loop?

open-multi-agent is written in TypeScript and coze-loop in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-multi-agent or coze-loop?

Choose open-multi-agent if you want the larger community (6,943 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose coze-loop if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.