head to head · open source

neko vs songloft

neko has 22,315 GitHub stars, 1,628 forks, 151 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. songloft has 1,746 stars, 143 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. neko leads on adoption by 1,178% (22,315 vs 1,746 stars). neko is written in Go under Apache-2.0; songloft is written in Go under Apache-2.0. neko has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, songloft 8%. songloft was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (docker), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

neko ★ 22K songloft ★ 1.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

neko songloft
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 1.7K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 143
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick neko if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full neko profile →

pick songloft if

  • You want the songloft feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and songloft fits your workflow better

full songloft profile →

About neko

Neko is a self hosted virtual browser that runs inside a Docker container and streams its desktop to several people at once over WebRTC, built for developers testing web applications, privacy conscious users, and teams who want to browse, watch or present together in one shared session.

read the full neko overview →

About songloft

Songloft is a self hosted music server written in Go under Apache 2.0. It manages music files the user already owns and provides no built in copyrighted content. The project was renamed from MiMusic at version 2.0, with old GitHub and Docker paths kept as redirects for at least one year.

read the full songloft overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

neko vs Jellyfin neko vs Invidious neko vs Navidrome neko vs Kodi neko vs Nuclear neko vs PeerTube neko vs iptv-sources neko vs ansible-nas neko vs Anthias neko vs tvheadend neko vs Ghosten-Player neko vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is neko or songloft more popular?

neko has 22,315 GitHub stars and songloft has 1,746. neko has the larger community by that measure.

Are neko and songloft free?

Both are open source. neko is licensed under Apache-2.0 and songloft under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between neko and songloft?

neko is written in Go and songloft in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, neko or songloft?

Choose neko if you want the larger community (22,315 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose songloft if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.