head to head · open source

neko vs podsync

neko has 22,326 GitHub stars, 1,628 forks, 151 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. podsync has 1,961 stars, 314 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped yesterday. neko leads on adoption by 1,039% (22,326 vs 1,961 stars). neko is written in Go under Apache-2.0; podsync is written in Go under MIT. neko has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, podsync 16%. podsync was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (docker, golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

neko ★ 22K podsync ★ 2.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

neko podsync
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 2.0K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 314
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick neko if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full neko profile →

pick podsync if

  • You want the podsync feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and podsync fits your workflow better

full podsync profile →

About neko

Neko is a self hosted virtual browser that runs inside a Docker container and streams its desktop to several people at once over WebRTC, built for developers testing web applications, privacy conscious users, and teams who want to browse, watch or present together in one shared session.

read the full neko overview →

About podsync

Podsync is a free, MIT licensed Go service that turns YouTube or Vimeo channels, users, or playlists into podcast feeds, and it is built for people who want YouTube and Vimeo content delivered through a podcast client instead of the platforms' own apps.

read the full podsync overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

neko vs Jellyfin neko vs Invidious neko vs Navidrome neko vs Kodi neko vs Nuclear neko vs PeerTube neko vs iptv-sources neko vs ansible-nas neko vs Anthias neko vs tvheadend neko vs Ghosten-Player neko vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is neko or podsync more popular?

neko has 22,326 GitHub stars and podsync has 1,961. neko has the larger community by that measure.

Are neko and podsync free?

Both are open source. neko is licensed under Apache-2.0 and podsync under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between neko and podsync?

neko is written in Go and podsync in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, neko or podsync?

Choose neko if you want the larger community (22,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose podsync if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.