head to head · open source

neko vs MovieBox-Tui

neko has 22,315 GitHub stars, 1,628 forks, 151 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. MovieBox-Tui has 2,029 stars, 216 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. neko leads on adoption by 1,000% (22,315 vs 2,029 stars). neko is written in Go under Apache-2.0; MovieBox-Tui is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. neko has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, MovieBox-Tui 11%. MovieBox-Tui was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

neko ★ 22K MovieBox-Tui ★ 2.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

neko MovieBox-Tui
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 2.0K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 216
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick neko if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full neko profile →

pick MovieBox-Tui if

  • You want the MovieBox-Tui feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and MovieBox-Tui fits your workflow better

full MovieBox-Tui profile →

About neko

Neko is a self hosted virtual browser that runs inside a Docker container and streams its desktop to several people at once over WebRTC, built for developers testing web applications, privacy conscious users, and teams who want to browse, watch or present together in one shared session.

read the full neko overview →

About MovieBox-Tui

MovieBox Tui is a Rust terminal user interface for finding, downloading, and streaming movies, TV shows, anime, and live television. It lives in the command line media ecosystem, using ratatui and local players such as mpv, IINA, VLC, or Android video players. The project gives users one keyboard driven workspace for searching titles, browsing providers, importing IPTV playlists, and launching playback.

read the full MovieBox-Tui overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K Jellyfin ★ 57K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

neko vs Jellyfin neko vs Invidious neko vs Navidrome neko vs Kodi neko vs Nuclear neko vs PeerTube neko vs iptv-sources neko vs ansible-nas neko vs Anthias neko vs tvheadend neko vs Ghosten-Player neko vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is neko or MovieBox-Tui more popular?

neko has 22,315 GitHub stars and MovieBox-Tui has 2,029. neko has the larger community by that measure.

Are neko and MovieBox-Tui free?

Both are open source. neko is licensed under Apache-2.0 and MovieBox-Tui under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between neko and MovieBox-Tui?

neko is written in Go and MovieBox-Tui in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, neko or MovieBox-Tui?

Choose neko if you want the larger community (22,315 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose MovieBox-Tui if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.