head to head · open source

neko vs ComeCut

neko has 22,326 GitHub stars, 1,628 forks, 151 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. ComeCut has 591 stars, 76 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. neko leads on adoption by 3,678% (22,326 vs 591 stars). neko is written in Go under Apache-2.0; ComeCut is written in HTML under AGPL-3.0. neko has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, ComeCut 13%. ComeCut was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

neko ★ 22K ComeCut ★ 591 category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

neko ComeCut
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 591
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Go HTML
Last push 2026-09-10 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 76
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick neko if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full neko profile →

pick ComeCut if

  • You want the ComeCut feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and ComeCut fits your workflow better

full ComeCut profile →

About neko

Neko is a self hosted virtual browser that runs inside a Docker container and streams its desktop to several people at once over WebRTC, built for developers testing web applications, privacy conscious users, and teams who want to browse, watch or present together in one shared session.

read the full neko overview →

About ComeCut

ComeCut (「来剪」) is a free, lightweight, AI assisted video editing suite that runs in the browser and as a Windows desktop application, built for creators who want a CapCut like editor without accounts, fees, or cloud uploads.

read the full ComeCut overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

neko vs Jellyfin neko vs Invidious neko vs Navidrome neko vs Kodi neko vs Nuclear neko vs PeerTube neko vs iptv-sources neko vs ansible-nas neko vs Anthias neko vs tvheadend neko vs Ghosten-Player neko vs BookWyrm

Frequently asked questions

Is neko or ComeCut more popular?

neko has 22,326 GitHub stars and ComeCut has 591. neko has the larger community by that measure.

Are neko and ComeCut free?

Both are open source. neko is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ComeCut under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between neko and ComeCut?

neko is written in Go and ComeCut in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, neko or ComeCut?

Choose neko if you want the larger community (22,326 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ComeCut if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.