head to head · open source
motion vs webgradients
motion has 34,972 GitHub stars, 1,520 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webgradients has 2,496 stars, 145 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. motion leads on adoption by 1,301% (34,972 vs 2,496 stars). motion is written in TypeScript under MIT; webgradients is written in CSS under MIT. motion has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, webgradients 6%. motion was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| motion | webgradients | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 35K | ★ 2.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | CSS |
| Last push | 2026-11-07 | 2026-08-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.5K | ⑂ 145 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick motion if
- You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick webgradients if
- You want the webgradients feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches CSS
- You evaluated both and webgradients fits your workflow better
About motion
Motion An open source animation library for JavaScript, React and Vue Table of Contents 1. Why Motion? 2. 🍦 Platforms 3. 🎓 Examples 4. ⚡️ Motion+ 5. 👩🏻⚖️ License 6. 💎 Contribute 7. ✨ Sponsors Why Motion? Simple API: First class React, JavaScript, and Vue packages. Hybrid engine: Power of JavaScript combined with native browser APIs for 120fps, GPU accelerated animations. Production ready: TypeScript, extensive test suite, tree shakable, tiny footprint. Batteries included: Gestures, springs, layout transitions, scroll linked effects, timelines. 🍦 Platforms Motion is available for React, JavaScript and Vue…
read the full motion overview →
About webgradients
WebGradients If you like WebGradients, consider supporting the project — it helps keep the tools free, fast, and ad free. A curated collection of 180 splendid gradients made in CSS3 , .sketch , .PSD and Figma formats — free for personal and commercial use. View all the gradients here » Made by Dima Braven · itmeo Machine readable data All 180 gradients are also available as structured JSON — useful for design tools, generators, or feeding gradient data to an LLM/agent: gradients.json — full dataset with per stop color positions gradients parsed.json — flattened variant with zero padded index deg is the CSS…
read the full webgradients overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is motion or webgradients more popular?
motion has 34,972 GitHub stars and webgradients has 2,496. motion has the larger community by that measure.
Are motion and webgradients free?
Both are open source. motion is licensed under MIT and webgradients under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between motion and webgradients?
motion is written in TypeScript and webgradients in CSS. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, motion or webgradients?
Choose motion if you want the larger community (34,972 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose webgradients if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.