head to head · open source
motion vs webgradients
motion has 33,697 GitHub stars, 1,368 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webgradients has 2,478 stars, 140 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. motion leads on adoption by 1,260% (33,697 vs 2,478 stars). motion is written in TypeScript under MIT; webgradients is written in CSS under MIT. motion has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, webgradients 6%. motion was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| motion | webgradients | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 34K | ★ 2.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | CSS |
| Last push | 2026-09-22 | 2026-08-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.4K | ⑂ 140 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick motion if
- You weight community size — 34K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick webgradients if
- You want the webgradients feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches CSS
- You evaluated both and webgradients fits your workflow better
About motion
Motion is an open source, MIT licensed animation library for React, JavaScript and Vue that provides a simple API and a hybrid engine for 120fps, GPU accelerated animation.
read the full motion overview →
About webgradients
WebGradients is a curated, MIT licensed collection of 180 ready made gradients distributed as CSS3, Sketch, PSD and Figma assets alongside a machine readable JSON dataset, aimed at frontend developers, designers and AI agent builders who need polished background colour treatments without composing them from scratch.
read the full webgradients overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is motion or webgradients more popular?
motion has 33,697 GitHub stars and webgradients has 2,478. motion has the larger community by that measure.
Are motion and webgradients free?
Both are open source. motion is licensed under MIT and webgradients under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between motion and webgradients?
motion is written in TypeScript and webgradients in CSS. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, motion or webgradients?
Choose motion if you want the larger community (33,697 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose webgradients if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.