head to head · open source

Jellyfin vs Ghosten-Player

Jellyfin has 57,244 GitHub stars, 5,523 forks, 684 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ghosten-Player has 3,294 stars, 201 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Jellyfin leads on adoption by 1,638% (57,244 vs 3,294 stars). Jellyfin is written in C# under GPL-2.0; Ghosten-Player is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. Jellyfin has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Ghosten-Player 6%. Ghosten-Player was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (jellyfin), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jellyfin ★ 57K Ghosten-Player ★ 3.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jellyfin Ghosten-Player
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 3.3K
License GPL-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in C# Dart
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.5K ⑂ 201
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jellyfin if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jellyfin profile →

pick Ghosten-Player if

  • You want the Ghosten-Player feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and Ghosten-Player fits your workflow better

full Ghosten-Player profile →

About Jellyfin

Jellyfin is a free and open source media server that lets an individual or an organisation manage and stream their own movies, music, and other media from a dedicated server to end user devices through multiple client apps.

read the full Jellyfin overview →

About Ghosten-Player

Ghosten Player is a Flutter based video player for Android phone, pad, and TV, with Windows and macOS support in development. It is a Dart app under AGPL 3.0 in the Android media and streaming ecosystem. The project gathers video resources into a local private media library instead of requiring a hosted backend.

read the full Ghosten-Player overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K Home Assistant ★ 91K OpenCut ★ 90K OpenBB ★ 73K LosslessCut ★ 44K

Related comparisons

jellyfin vs invidious jellyfin vs navidrome jellyfin vs neko jellyfin vs kodi jellyfin vs nuclear jellyfin vs peertube jellyfin vs iptv-sources jellyfin vs ansible-nas firecrawl vs godot godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Media & Streaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Media & Streaming field.

Jellyfin vs Invidious Jellyfin vs Navidrome Jellyfin vs neko Jellyfin vs Kodi Jellyfin vs Nuclear Jellyfin vs PeerTube Jellyfin vs iptv-sources Jellyfin vs ansible-nas Jellyfin vs Anthias Jellyfin vs tvheadend Jellyfin vs BookWyrm Jellyfin vs mytv-android

Frequently asked questions

Is Jellyfin or Ghosten-Player more popular?

Jellyfin has 57,244 GitHub stars and Ghosten-Player has 3,294. Jellyfin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jellyfin and Ghosten-Player free?

Both are open source. Jellyfin is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Ghosten-Player under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Jellyfin and Ghosten-Player?

Jellyfin is written in C# and Ghosten-Player in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jellyfin or Ghosten-Player?

Choose Jellyfin if you want the larger community (57,244 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Ghosten-Player if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.