head to head · open source

integration vs SonoffLAN

integration has 7,759 GitHub stars, 1,593 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. SonoffLAN has 3,316 stars, 478 forks, 184 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. integration leads on adoption by 134% (7,759 vs 3,316 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; SonoffLAN is written in Python under MIT. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, SonoffLAN 14%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (hacs, home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.8K SonoffLAN ★ 3.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration SonoffLAN
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 3.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-29 2026-09-27
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 478
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick SonoffLAN if

  • You want the SonoffLAN feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and SonoffLAN fits your workflow better

full SonoffLAN profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

About SonoffLAN

SonoffLAN is a Home Assistant custom component for people who want to control Sonoff devices running their original eWeLink firmware over local LAN, cloud, or both, without flashing anything.

read the full SonoffLAN overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 187K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

integration vs Home Assistant integration vs frigate integration vs homebridge integration vs oomwoo integration vs espectre integration vs operating-system integration vs hass-xiaomi-miot integration vs lovelace-mushroom integration vs CrateDB integration vs python-miio integration vs OpenMQTTGateway integration vs android

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or SonoffLAN more popular?

integration has 7,759 GitHub stars and SonoffLAN has 3,316. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and SonoffLAN free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and SonoffLAN under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and SonoffLAN?

integration is written in Python and SonoffLAN in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or SonoffLAN?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,759 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SonoffLAN if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.