head to head · open source
integration vs power-flow-card-plus
integration has 7,881 GitHub stars, 1,612 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. power-flow-card-plus has 1,209 stars, 190 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. integration leads on adoption by 552% (7,881 vs 1,209 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; power-flow-card-plus is written in various languages under MIT. integration has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, power-flow-card-plus 16%. power-flow-card-plus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| integration | power-flow-card-plus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.9K | ★ 1.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | — |
| Last push | 2026-11-08 | 2026-11-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 190 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick integration if
- You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick power-flow-card-plus if
- You want the power-flow-card-plus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- You evaluated both and power-flow-card-plus fits your workflow better
About integration
HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) Manage (Install, track, upgrade) and discover custom elements for Home Assistant directly from the UI. What? HACS is an integration that gives the user a powerful UI to handle downloads of custom needs. Highlights of what HACS can do: Help you discover new custom elements. Help you download new custom elements. Help you keep track of your custom elements. Manage(download/update/remove) Shortcuts to repositories/issue tracker Useful links General documentation Configuration FAQ GitHub Discord Become a GitHub sponsor? ❤️ BuyMe Coffee Beer? 🍺🙈 Issues If When you experience…
read the full integration overview →
About power-flow-card-plus
Power Flow Card Plus [!TIP] 📖 Full documentation: cards.flixlix.com/power flow card plus The docs site has the complete configuration reference, an interactive configurator with copy pasteable YAML, and ready made examples — much easier to navigate than this README. Installation Configuration reference Interactive configurator Examples [!NOTE] This card is distributed via flixlix/power flow card plus, but the source code lives in the monorepo at flixlix/flixlix cards. Issues and feature requests will be tracked there going forward. Additional Features / Enhancements UI Editor!!! 🥳 Multiple Language support…
read the full power-flow-card-plus overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is integration or power-flow-card-plus more popular?
integration has 7,881 GitHub stars and power-flow-card-plus has 1,209. integration has the larger community by that measure.
Are integration and power-flow-card-plus free?
Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and power-flow-card-plus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between integration and power-flow-card-plus?
integration is written in Python and power-flow-card-plus in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, integration or power-flow-card-plus?
Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,881 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose power-flow-card-plus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.