head to head · open source

integration vs local_roborock_server

integration has 7,756 GitHub stars, 1,593 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped today. local_roborock_server has 759 stars, 36 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped yesterday. integration leads on adoption by 922% (7,756 vs 759 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; local_roborock_server is written in Python under MIT. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, local_roborock_server 5%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.8K local_roborock_server ★ 759 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration local_roborock_server
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 759
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-29 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 36
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick local_roborock_server if

  • You want the local_roborock_server feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and local_roborock_server fits your workflow better

full local_roborock_server profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

About local_roborock_server

Roborock Local Server is a self hosted HTTPS and MQTT cloud emulator that lets Roborock robot vacuums keep live maps and local controls on an isolated LAN without internet access, rooting the firmware, or modifying the hardware, and it is aimed at self hosters and Home Assistant users who want to take the vendor cloud out of the loop.

read the full local_roborock_server overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 186K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

integration vs Home Assistant integration vs frigate integration vs homebridge integration vs oomwoo integration vs espectre integration vs operating-system integration vs hass-xiaomi-miot integration vs lovelace-mushroom integration vs CrateDB integration vs python-miio integration vs OpenMQTTGateway integration vs android

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or local_roborock_server more popular?

integration has 7,756 GitHub stars and local_roborock_server has 759. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and local_roborock_server free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and local_roborock_server under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and local_roborock_server?

integration is written in Python and local_roborock_server in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or local_roborock_server?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,756 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose local_roborock_server if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.