head to head · open source

integration vs HAP-NodeJS

integration has 7,740 GitHub stars, 1,591 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HAP-NodeJS has 2,722 stars, 619 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. integration leads on adoption by 184% (7,740 vs 2,722 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; HAP-NodeJS is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, HAP-NodeJS 23%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.7K HAP-NodeJS ★ 2.7K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration HAP-NodeJS
GitHub stars ★ 7.7K ★ 2.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-08-22
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 619
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick HAP-NodeJS if

  • You want the HAP-NodeJS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and HAP-NodeJS fits your workflow better

full HAP-NodeJS profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

About HAP-NodeJS

HAP NodeJS is a TypeScript implementation of the server side of Apple's HomeKit Accessory Protocol (HAP), published under the Apache 2.0 licence as a library for developers who want to build their own HomeKit accessories on Raspberry Pi, Intel Edison, or any other platform that can run Node.js.

read the full HAP-NodeJS overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

integration vs Home Assistant integration vs frigate integration vs homebridge integration vs oomwoo integration vs espectre integration vs operating-system integration vs hass-xiaomi-miot integration vs CrateDB integration vs python-miio integration vs OpenMQTTGateway integration vs android integration vs domoticz

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or HAP-NodeJS more popular?

integration has 7,740 GitHub stars and HAP-NodeJS has 2,722. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and HAP-NodeJS free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and HAP-NodeJS under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and HAP-NodeJS?

integration is written in Python and HAP-NodeJS in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or HAP-NodeJS?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,740 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose HAP-NodeJS if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.