head to head · open source

integration vs bermuda

integration has 7,744 GitHub stars, 1,593 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bermuda has 2,057 stars, 74 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. integration leads on adoption by 276% (7,744 vs 2,057 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; bermuda is written in Python under MIT. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, bermuda 4%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.7K bermuda ★ 2.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration bermuda
GitHub stars ★ 7.7K ★ 2.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 74
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick bermuda if

  • You want the bermuda feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and bermuda fits your workflow better

full bermuda profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

About bermuda

Bermuda is a Home Assistant custom integration, distributed through HACS, that tracks Bluetooth Low Energy devices by room using ESPHome Bluetooth Proxies and Shelly Gen2 or later devices — built for smart home owners who want area level or home/not home presence without buying dedicated tracking hardware.

read the full bermuda overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

integration vs Home Assistant integration vs frigate integration vs homebridge integration vs oomwoo integration vs espectre integration vs operating-system integration vs hass-xiaomi-miot integration vs lovelace-mushroom integration vs CrateDB integration vs python-miio integration vs OpenMQTTGateway integration vs android

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or bermuda more popular?

integration has 7,744 GitHub stars and bermuda has 2,057. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and bermuda free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and bermuda under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and bermuda?

integration is written in Python and bermuda in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or bermuda?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,744 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose bermuda if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.