head to head · open source
integration vs homeassistant_espscreen
integration has 7,881 GitHub stars, 1,612 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. homeassistant_espscreen has 1,084 stars, 161 forks, 60 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. integration leads on adoption by 627% (7,881 vs 1,084 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; homeassistant_espscreen is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. integration has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, homeassistant_espscreen 15%. homeassistant_espscreen was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (home-assistant), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| integration | homeassistant_espscreen | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 7.9K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-08 | 2026-11-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.6K | ⑂ 161 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick integration if
- You weight community size — 7.9K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick homeassistant_espscreen if
- You want the homeassistant_espscreen feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and homeassistant_espscreen fits your workflow better
About integration
HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) Manage (Install, track, upgrade) and discover custom elements for Home Assistant directly from the UI. What? HACS is an integration that gives the user a powerful UI to handle downloads of custom needs. Highlights of what HACS can do: Help you discover new custom elements. Help you download new custom elements. Help you keep track of your custom elements. Manage(download/update/remove) Shortcuts to repositories/issue tracker Useful links General documentation Configuration FAQ GitHub Discord Become a GitHub sponsor? ❤️ BuyMe Coffee Beer? 🍺🙈 Issues If When you experience…
read the full integration overview →
About homeassistant_espscreen
Tessera Touch screens for Home Assistant. A screen for every room, one simple editor. Website · Quick start · Supported screens · Community · My screen works Tessera is not in the standard App store. This button adds its repository to your Home Assistant. After that, Tessera Screen Manager is in the store like any other app. Tessera is the new name for ESP Screens. In Home Assistant the app is called Tessera Screen Manager and its panel Tessera (app 0.3.18); the repository, the add on and your screens stay exactly as they are. Looking for e ink? Tessera is for colour LCD touch screens. For calm dashboards on e…
read the full homeassistant_espscreen overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Internet of Things (IoT) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is integration or homeassistant_espscreen more popular?
integration has 7,881 GitHub stars and homeassistant_espscreen has 1,084. integration has the larger community by that measure.
Are integration and homeassistant_espscreen free?
Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and homeassistant_espscreen under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between integration and homeassistant_espscreen?
integration is written in Python and homeassistant_espscreen in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, integration or homeassistant_espscreen?
Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,881 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose homeassistant_espscreen if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.