head to head · open source

frp vs smartdns

frp has 109,502 GitHub stars, 15,213 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. smartdns has 11,312 stars, 1,247 forks, 320 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 868% (109,502 vs 11,312 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; smartdns is written in C under GPL-3.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, smartdns 11%. frp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K smartdns ★ 11K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp smartdns
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-08-30
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick smartdns if

  • You want the smartdns feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and smartdns fits your workflow better

full smartdns profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About smartdns

SmartDNS is a local DNS server, written in C and licensed under GPL 3.0, that accepts DNS queries from local clients, asks multiple upstream DNS servers, and returns the IP address with the fastest measured access speed — built for self hosters, router owners, and network operators who want faster name resolution and stronger privacy.

read the full smartdns overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs openvpn-install frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns frp vs sliver frp vs OpenSurge-for-Mac frp vs WR.DO

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or smartdns more popular?

frp has 109,502 GitHub stars and smartdns has 11,312. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and smartdns free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and smartdns under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and smartdns?

frp is written in Go and smartdns in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or smartdns?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,502 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose smartdns if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.