head to head · open source

frp vs coredns

frp has 109,502 GitHub stars, 15,213 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. coredns has 14,329 stars, 2,532 forks, 282 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. frp leads on adoption by 664% (109,502 vs 14,329 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; coredns is written in Go under Apache-2.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, coredns 18%. coredns was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (go), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K coredns ★ 14K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp coredns
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 14K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 2.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick coredns if

  • You want the coredns feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and coredns fits your workflow better

full coredns profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About coredns

CoreDNS is a CNCF graduated DNS server and forwarder written in Go that resolves queries through a chain of plugins, aimed at platform and infrastructure engineers who run DNS for Kubernetes clusters, service discovery, or authoritative zones and need to extend its behaviour without forking the core.

read the full coredns overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs openvpn-install frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs sliver frp vs smartdns frp vs OpenSurge-for-Mac frp vs WR.DO

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or coredns more popular?

frp has 109,502 GitHub stars and coredns has 14,329. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and coredns free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and coredns under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and coredns?

frp is written in Go and coredns in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or coredns?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,502 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose coredns if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.