head to head · open source

frp vs AdGuardHome

frp has 109,502 GitHub stars, 15,213 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. AdGuardHome has 36,970 stars, 2,520 forks, 1,253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. frp leads on adoption by 196% (109,502 vs 36,970 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; AdGuardHome is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, AdGuardHome 7%. AdGuardHome was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K AdGuardHome ★ 37K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp AdGuardHome
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 37K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 2.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick AdGuardHome if

  • You want the AdGuardHome feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and AdGuardHome fits your workflow better

full AdGuardHome profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About AdGuardHome

AdGuard Home is a free and open source, network wide DNS server that blocks ads and trackers for every device on a network, aimed at self hosters, homelab operators, and network administrators who want filtering without installing client side software on each device.

read the full AdGuardHome overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

immich vs openvpn immich vs wr-do uptime-kuma vs openvpn worldmonitor vs openvpn mall vs openvpn uptime-kuma vs wr-do worldmonitor vs wr-do mall vs wr-do n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra ansible vs haystack

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs openvpn-install frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns frp vs sliver frp vs smartdns frp vs OpenSurge-for-Mac frp vs WR.DO

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or AdGuardHome more popular?

frp has 109,502 GitHub stars and AdGuardHome has 36,970. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and AdGuardHome free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and AdGuardHome under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and AdGuardHome?

frp is written in Go and AdGuardHome in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or AdGuardHome?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,502 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose AdGuardHome if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.