head to head · open source

frp vs hestiacp

frp has 109,545 GitHub stars, 15,219 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. hestiacp has 4,503 stars, 945 forks, 146 open issues and last shipped yesterday. frp leads on adoption by 2,333% (109,545 vs 4,503 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; hestiacp is written in Shell under GPL-3.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, hestiacp 21%. hestiacp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K hestiacp ★ 4.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp hestiacp
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 4.5K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Shell
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 945
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick hestiacp if

  • You want the hestiacp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and hestiacp fits your workflow better

full hestiacp profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About hestiacp

Hestia Control Panel is a GPL 3.0, shell based control panel that gives Linux server administrators a web and command line interface for deploying and managing web domains, mail accounts, DNS zones, and databases on Debian and Ubuntu servers.

read the full hestiacp overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs plakar frp vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs cloudflared frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or hestiacp more popular?

frp has 109,545 GitHub stars and hestiacp has 4,503. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and hestiacp free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and hestiacp under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and hestiacp?

frp is written in Go and hestiacp in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or hestiacp?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,545 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose hestiacp if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.