head to head · open source

frp vs gravity

frp has 109,718 GitHub stars, 15,232 forks, 48 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. gravity has 930 stars, 31 forks, 59 open issues and last shipped yesterday. frp leads on adoption by 11,698% (109,718 vs 930 stars). frp is written in Go under Apache-2.0; gravity is written in Go under GPL-3.0. frp has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, gravity 3%. gravity was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

frp ★ 110K gravity ★ 930 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

frp gravity
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 930
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-15 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 15K ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick frp if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full frp profile →

pick gravity if

  • You want the gravity feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and gravity fits your workflow better

full gravity profile →

About frp

frp is a fast reverse proxy written in Go that exposes a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet, built for operators and developers who need inbound access to machines they cannot port forward.

read the full frp overview →

About gravity

Gravity is a fully replicated DNS, DHCP and TFTP server with ad blocking, written in Go and backed by etcd, for self hosters and network operators who want name and address services that stay consistent across a cluster.

read the full gravity overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 88K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K

Related comparisons

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs adguardhome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs plakar frp vs pluton caddy vs traefik immich vs openvpn n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job

More Networking & Connectivity projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Networking & Connectivity field.

frp vs caddy frp vs traefik frp vs AdGuardHome frp vs nginx frp vs algo frp vs nginx-proxy frp vs goproxy frp vs openvpn-install frp vs cloudflared frp vs amnezia-client frp vs OpenVPN frp vs coredns

Frequently asked questions

Is frp or gravity more popular?

frp has 109,718 GitHub stars and gravity has 930. frp has the larger community by that measure.

Are frp and gravity free?

Both are open source. frp is licensed under Apache-2.0 and gravity under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between frp and gravity?

frp is written in Go and gravity in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, frp or gravity?

Choose frp if you want the larger community (109,718 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose gravity if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.