head to head · open source

figma-use vs partmode

figma-use has 606 GitHub stars, 44 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. partmode has 511 stars, 24 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. figma-use leads on adoption by 19% (606 vs 511 stars). figma-use is written in TypeScript under MIT; partmode is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0. figma-use has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, partmode 5%. partmode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-agents), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

figma-use ★ 606 partmode ★ 511 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

figma-use partmode
GitHub stars ★ 606 ★ 511
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-07-03 2026-08-17
Forks ⑂ 44 ⑂ 24
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick figma-use if

  • You weight community size — 606 stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full figma-use profile →

pick partmode if

  • You want the partmode feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and partmode fits your workflow better

full partmode profile →

About figma-use

figma use is an MIT licensed TypeScript command line tool that lets developers and AI agents read and write Figma files directly from the terminal, with more than 100 commands for creating shapes, text, components, styles, and exported images.

read the full figma-use overview →

About partmode

PartMode is an open source, local first 3D parametric CAD application that runs in the browser for people and for permissioned typed agents, built on OpenCascade WebAssembly, and it is aimed at mechanical designers, engineers, and agent developers who want exact parametric modelling without a desktop CAD installation.

read the full partmode overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

figma-use vs ant-design figma-use vs open-design figma-use vs manim figma-use vs anime figma-use vs hyperframes figma-use vs daisyui figma-use vs tabler figma-use vs motion figma-use vs layui figma-use vs lottie-ios figma-use vs vant figma-use vs primitives

Frequently asked questions

Is figma-use or partmode more popular?

figma-use has 606 GitHub stars and partmode has 511. figma-use has the larger community by that measure.

Are figma-use and partmode free?

Both are open source. figma-use is licensed under MIT and partmode under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between figma-use and partmode?

figma-use is written in TypeScript and partmode in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, figma-use or partmode?

Choose figma-use if you want the larger community (606 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose partmode if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.