head to head · open source

hyperframes vs figma-use

hyperframes has 56,902 GitHub stars, 5,104 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped yesterday. figma-use has 606 stars, 44 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. hyperframes leads on adoption by 9,290% (56,902 vs 606 stars). hyperframes is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; figma-use is written in TypeScript under MIT. hyperframes has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, figma-use 7%. hyperframes was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hyperframes ★ 57K figma-use ★ 606 category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

hyperframes figma-use
GitHub stars ★ 57K ★ 606
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-10-05 2026-07-03
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 44
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hyperframes if

  • You weight community size — 57K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hyperframes profile →

pick figma-use if

  • You want the figma-use feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and figma-use fits your workflow better

full figma-use profile →

About hyperframes

HyperFrames is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript framework that turns HTML, CSS, media, and seekable animations into deterministic MP4 video, built for developers and AI coding agents that need repeatable video output from code.

read the full hyperframes overview →

About figma-use

figma use is an MIT licensed TypeScript command line tool that lets developers and AI agents read and write Figma files directly from the terminal, with more than 100 commands for creating shapes, text, components, styles, and exported images.

read the full figma-use overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 189K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 95K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

hyperframes vs ant-design hyperframes vs open-design hyperframes vs manim hyperframes vs anime hyperframes vs daisyui hyperframes vs tabler hyperframes vs motion hyperframes vs layui hyperframes vs lottie-ios hyperframes vs vant hyperframes vs primitives hyperframes vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is hyperframes or figma-use more popular?

hyperframes has 56,902 GitHub stars and figma-use has 606. hyperframes has the larger community by that measure.

Are hyperframes and figma-use free?

Both are open source. hyperframes is licensed under Apache-2.0 and figma-use under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hyperframes and figma-use?

hyperframes is written in TypeScript and figma-use in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hyperframes or figma-use?

Choose hyperframes if you want the larger community (56,902 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose figma-use if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.