head to head · open source

imgui vs Babylon.js

imgui has 76,257 GitHub stars, 12,045 forks, 1,227 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Babylon.js has 26,085 stars, 3,686 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped yesterday. imgui leads on adoption by 192% (76,257 vs 26,085 stars). imgui is written in C++ under MIT; Babylon.js is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. imgui has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, Babylon.js 14%. Babylon.js was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (game-development, game-engine), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

imgui ★ 76K Babylon.js ★ 26K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

imgui Babylon.js
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 26K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C++ TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 3.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick imgui if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full imgui profile →

pick Babylon.js if

  • You want the Babylon.js feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Babylon.js fits your workflow better

full Babylon.js profile →

About imgui

Dear ImGui is a bloat free, MIT licensed graphical user interface library for C++ that outputs optimized vertex buffers for rendering inside 3D pipeline enabled applications, and it is aimed at programmers building content creation, visualization, and debug tools rather than at developers shipping consumer facing UI.

read the full imgui overview →

About Babylon.js

Babylon.js is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed 3D game and rendering engine written in TypeScript, built for JavaScript and TypeScript developers who want to create browser based 3D games, visualizations and WebXR experiences inside a friendly JavaScript framework.

read the full Babylon.js overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs parlant

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

imgui vs Godot imgui vs three.js imgui vs bevy imgui vs raylib imgui vs GDevelop imgui vs MonoGame imgui vs Pumpkin imgui vs azerothcore-wotlk imgui vs zinx imgui vs colyseus imgui vs s&box imgui vs pokerth

Frequently asked questions

Is imgui or Babylon.js more popular?

imgui has 76,257 GitHub stars and Babylon.js has 26,085. imgui has the larger community by that measure.

Are imgui and Babylon.js free?

Both are open source. imgui is licensed under MIT and Babylon.js under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between imgui and Babylon.js?

imgui is written in C++ and Babylon.js in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, imgui or Babylon.js?

Choose imgui if you want the larger community (76,257 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Babylon.js if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.