head to head · open source

imgui vs ebiten

imgui has 76,337 GitHub stars, 12,054 forks, 1,227 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ebiten has 13,501 stars, 791 forks, 296 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. imgui leads on adoption by 465% (76,337 vs 13,501 stars). imgui is written in C++ under MIT; ebiten is written in Go under Apache-2.0. imgui has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, ebiten 6%. ebiten was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (game-development, game-engine, gamedev), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

imgui ★ 76K ebiten ★ 14K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

imgui ebiten
GitHub stars ★ 76K ★ 14K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Go
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 12K ⑂ 791
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick imgui if

  • You weight community size — 76K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full imgui profile →

pick ebiten if

  • You want the ebiten feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and ebiten fits your workflow better

full ebiten profile →

About imgui

Dear ImGui is a bloat free, MIT licensed graphical user interface library for C++ that outputs optimized vertex buffers for rendering inside 3D pipeline enabled applications, and it is aimed at programmers building content creation, visualization, and debug tools rather than at developers shipping consumer facing UI.

read the full imgui overview →

About ebiten

Ebitengine (v2) is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed 2D game engine for the Go programming language, built for developers who want a simple API for writing 2D games that deploy across desktop, mobile, web and console platforms.

read the full ebiten overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

imgui vs Godot imgui vs three.js imgui vs bevy imgui vs raylib imgui vs GDevelop imgui vs Babylon.js imgui vs libgdx imgui vs aframe imgui vs OpenRA imgui vs engine imgui vs MonoGame imgui vs Pumpkin

Frequently asked questions

Is imgui or ebiten more popular?

imgui has 76,337 GitHub stars and ebiten has 13,501. imgui has the larger community by that measure.

Are imgui and ebiten free?

Both are open source. imgui is licensed under MIT and ebiten under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between imgui and ebiten?

imgui is written in C++ and ebiten in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, imgui or ebiten?

Choose imgui if you want the larger community (76,337 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ebiten if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.