head to head · open source

integration vs domoticz

integration has 7,738 GitHub stars, 1,591 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped yesterday. domoticz has 3,810 stars, 1,159 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. integration leads on adoption by 103% (7,738 vs 3,810 stars). integration is written in Python under MIT; domoticz is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. integration has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, domoticz 30%. integration was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

integration ★ 7.7K domoticz ★ 3.8K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

integration domoticz
GitHub stars ★ 7.7K ★ 3.8K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Python C++
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick integration if

  • You weight community size — 7.7K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full integration profile →

pick domoticz if

  • You want the domoticz feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and domoticz fits your workflow better

full domoticz profile →

About integration

HACS (Home Assistant Community Store) is an MIT licensed Python integration that gives Home Assistant users a user interface for discovering, installing, tracking, and updating custom elements without leaving Home Assistant itself.

read the full integration overview →

About domoticz

Domoticz is free open source home automation system for Linux, Windows, macOS, FreeBSD, Raspberry Pi, ARM boards. It monitors and controls lights, switches, sensors for temperature, rain, wind, UV, energy, gas, water. It lives in IoT and home automation ecosystem, using HTML5 web frontend and hardware integrations such as Z Wave, Zigbee, MQTT, Philips Hue, RFXCOM. It is written in C++ and licensed GPL 3.0.

read the full domoticz overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

integration vs Home Assistant integration vs frigate integration vs homebridge integration vs oomwoo integration vs espectre integration vs hass-xiaomi-miot integration vs CrateDB integration vs python-miio integration vs OpenMQTTGateway integration vs android integration vs IRremoteESP8266 integration vs linux-android

Frequently asked questions

Is integration or domoticz more popular?

integration has 7,738 GitHub stars and domoticz has 3,810. integration has the larger community by that measure.

Are integration and domoticz free?

Both are open source. integration is licensed under MIT and domoticz under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between integration and domoticz?

integration is written in Python and domoticz in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, integration or domoticz?

Choose integration if you want the larger community (7,738 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose domoticz if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.