head to head · open source

CrateDB vs home-assistant-glow

CrateDB has 4,450 GitHub stars, 620 forks, 332 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. home-assistant-glow has 1,279 stars, 179 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. CrateDB leads on adoption by 248% (4,450 vs 1,279 stars). CrateDB is written in Java under Apache-2.0; home-assistant-glow is written in various languages under MIT. CrateDB has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, home-assistant-glow 14%. home-assistant-glow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (iot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CrateDB ★ 4.5K home-assistant-glow ★ 1.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CrateDB home-assistant-glow
GitHub stars ★ 4.5K ★ 1.3K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java —
Last push 2026-11-07 2026-11-09
Forks ⑂ 620 ⑂ 179
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CrateDB if

  • You weight community size — 4.5K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CrateDB profile →

pick home-assistant-glow if

  • You want the home-assistant-glow feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • You evaluated both and home-assistant-glow fits your workflow better

full home-assistant-glow profile →

About CrateDB

.. image:: docs/ static/crate logo.svg :alt: CrateDB :target: .. image:: :target: .. image:: :target: .. image:: :target: Help us improve CrateDB by taking our User Survey! About ===== CrateDB is a distributed SQL database that makes it simple to store and analyze massive amounts of data in real time. CrateDB offers the benefits of an SQL database and the scalability and flexibility typically associated with NoSQL databases. Modest CrateDB clusters can ingest tens of thousands of records per second without breaking a sweat. You can run ad hoc queries using standard SQL . CrateDB's blazing fast distributed query…

read the full CrateDB overview →

About home-assistant-glow

Home Assistant Glow 🌟 ![Project Maintenance][maintenance shield] [![License][license shield]](LICENSE) [![Forks][forks shield]][forks url] [![Stargazers][stars shield]][stars url] [![Issues][issues shield]][issues url] [![GitHub Activity][commits shield]][commits] [![GitHub Last Commit][last commit shield]][commits] [![Contributors][contributors shield]][contributors url] During my internship at [Nabu Casa][nc] in the first half of 2021, I focused on energy management for your house, how to collect all energy data and display it on a dashboard. Since Home Assistant release 2021.8 it's possible to use the [Home…

read the full home-assistant-glow overview →

More in Miscellaneous

Related comparisons

More Internet of Things (IoT) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Internet of Things (IoT) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is CrateDB or home-assistant-glow more popular?

CrateDB has 4,450 GitHub stars and home-assistant-glow has 1,279. CrateDB has the larger community by that measure.

Are CrateDB and home-assistant-glow free?

Both are open source. CrateDB is licensed under Apache-2.0 and home-assistant-glow under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CrateDB and home-assistant-glow?

CrateDB is written in Java and home-assistant-glow in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CrateDB or home-assistant-glow?

Choose CrateDB if you want the larger community (4,450 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose home-assistant-glow if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.