head to head · open source

zinx vs colyseus

zinx has 7,764 GitHub stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. colyseus has 7,311 stars, 665 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped today. zinx leads on adoption by 6% (7,764 vs 7,311 stars). zinx is written in Go under MIT; colyseus is written in TypeScript under MIT. zinx has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, colyseus 9%. colyseus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zinx ★ 7.8K colyseus ★ 7.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zinx colyseus
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 7.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-06-06 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 665
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zinx if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zinx profile →

pick colyseus if

  • You want the colyseus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and colyseus fits your workflow better

full colyseus profile →

About zinx

Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.

read the full zinx overview →

About colyseus

Colyseus is an MIT licensed authoritative multiplayer framework for Node.js that provides synchronizable data structures, room based matchmaking, and client SDKs for TypeScript, React, Unity, Godot, GameMaker, Defold, Construct, Haxe, and C, aimed at developers building realtime and turn based multiplayer games.

read the full colyseus overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

zinx vs Godot zinx vs three.js zinx vs imgui zinx vs bevy zinx vs raylib zinx vs GDevelop zinx vs Babylon.js zinx vs libgdx zinx vs MonoGame zinx vs Pumpkin zinx vs azerothcore-wotlk zinx vs agones

Frequently asked questions

Is zinx or colyseus more popular?

zinx has 7,764 GitHub stars and colyseus has 7,311. zinx has the larger community by that measure.

Are zinx and colyseus free?

Both are open source. zinx is licensed under MIT and colyseus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zinx and colyseus?

zinx is written in Go and colyseus in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zinx or colyseus?

Choose zinx if you want the larger community (7,764 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose colyseus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.