head to head · open source

colyseus vs pinus

colyseus has 7,326 GitHub stars, 664 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. pinus has 1,932 stars, 392 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. colyseus leads on adoption by 279% (7,326 vs 1,932 stars). colyseus is written in TypeScript under MIT; pinus is written in JavaScript under MIT. colyseus has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, pinus 20%. colyseus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (game-server, nodejs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

colyseus ★ 7.3K pinus ★ 1.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

colyseus pinus
GitHub stars ★ 7.3K ★ 1.9K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-07-17
Forks ⑂ 664 ⑂ 392
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick colyseus if

  • You weight community size — 7.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full colyseus profile →

pick pinus if

  • You want the pinus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and pinus fits your workflow better

full pinus profile →

About colyseus

Colyseus is an MIT licensed authoritative multiplayer framework for Node.js that provides synchronizable data structures, room based matchmaking, and client SDKs for TypeScript, React, Unity, Godot, GameMaker, Defold, Construct, Haxe, and C, aimed at developers building realtime and turn based multiplayer games.

read the full colyseus overview →

About pinus

Pinus is a fast, scalable, distributed game server framework for Node.js, written in TypeScript and intended for developers building multiplayer games and real time applications such as chat and message push.

read the full pinus overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 185K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

colyseus vs Godot colyseus vs three.js colyseus vs imgui colyseus vs bevy colyseus vs raylib colyseus vs GDevelop colyseus vs Babylon.js colyseus vs libgdx colyseus vs aframe colyseus vs OpenRA colyseus vs engine colyseus vs MonoGame

Frequently asked questions

Is colyseus or pinus more popular?

colyseus has 7,326 GitHub stars and pinus has 1,932. colyseus has the larger community by that measure.

Are colyseus and pinus free?

Both are open source. colyseus is licensed under MIT and pinus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between colyseus and pinus?

colyseus is written in TypeScript and pinus in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, colyseus or pinus?

Choose colyseus if you want the larger community (7,326 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pinus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.