head to head · open source

aframe vs colyseus

aframe has 17,635 GitHub stars, 4,396 forks, 338 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. colyseus has 7,312 stars, 665 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. aframe leads on adoption by 141% (17,635 vs 7,312 stars). aframe is written in JavaScript under MIT; colyseus is written in TypeScript under MIT. aframe has attracted 25% as many forks as stars, colyseus 9%. colyseus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

aframe ★ 18K colyseus ★ 7.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

aframe colyseus
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 7.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-07-13 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 665
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick aframe if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full aframe profile →

pick colyseus if

  • You want the colyseus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and colyseus fits your workflow better

full colyseus profile →

About aframe

A Frame is an MIT licensed JavaScript web framework built on top of three.js that lets anyone who can write HTML build browser based 3D, augmented reality and virtual reality experiences running on desktop, mobile and any WebXR capable headset.

read the full aframe overview →

About colyseus

Colyseus is an MIT licensed authoritative multiplayer framework for Node.js that provides synchronizable data structures, room based matchmaking, and client SDKs for TypeScript, React, Unity, Godot, GameMaker, Defold, Construct, Haxe, and C, aimed at developers building realtime and turn based multiplayer games.

read the full colyseus overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

aframe vs Godot aframe vs three.js aframe vs imgui aframe vs bevy aframe vs raylib aframe vs GDevelop aframe vs Babylon.js aframe vs libgdx aframe vs MonoGame aframe vs Pumpkin aframe vs azerothcore-wotlk aframe vs zinx

Frequently asked questions

Is aframe or colyseus more popular?

aframe has 17,635 GitHub stars and colyseus has 7,312. aframe has the larger community by that measure.

Are aframe and colyseus free?

Both are open source. aframe is licensed under MIT and colyseus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between aframe and colyseus?

aframe is written in JavaScript and colyseus in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, aframe or colyseus?

Choose aframe if you want the larger community (17,635 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose colyseus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.