head to head · open source

colyseus vs mcrcon

colyseus has 7,327 GitHub stars, 666 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mcrcon has 1,085 stars, 126 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. colyseus leads on adoption by 575% (7,327 vs 1,085 stars). colyseus is written in TypeScript under MIT; mcrcon is written in C under Zlib. colyseus has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, mcrcon 12%. colyseus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

colyseus ★ 7.3K mcrcon ★ 1.1K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

colyseus mcrcon
GitHub stars ★ 7.3K ★ 1.1K
License MIT Zlib
Written in TypeScript C
Last push 2026-09-30 2025-12-01
Forks ⑂ 666 ⑂ 126
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick colyseus if

  • You weight community size — 7.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full colyseus profile →

pick mcrcon if

  • You want the mcrcon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and mcrcon fits your workflow better

full mcrcon profile →

About colyseus

Colyseus is an MIT licensed authoritative multiplayer framework for Node.js that provides synchronizable data structures, room based matchmaking, and client SDKs for TypeScript, React, Unity, Godot, GameMaker, Defold, Construct, Haxe, and C, aimed at developers building realtime and turn based multiplayer games.

read the full colyseus overview →

About mcrcon

mcrcon is a console based Rcon client for Minecraft that lets server administrators send remote administration commands and run server maintenance scripts from a Linux or Windows terminal.

read the full mcrcon overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 187K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 99K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

colyseus vs Godot colyseus vs three.js colyseus vs imgui colyseus vs bevy colyseus vs raylib colyseus vs GDevelop colyseus vs Babylon.js colyseus vs libgdx colyseus vs aframe colyseus vs OpenRA colyseus vs engine colyseus vs MonoGame

Frequently asked questions

Is colyseus or mcrcon more popular?

colyseus has 7,327 GitHub stars and mcrcon has 1,085. colyseus has the larger community by that measure.

Are colyseus and mcrcon free?

Both are open source. colyseus is licensed under MIT and mcrcon under Zlib. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between colyseus and mcrcon?

colyseus is written in TypeScript and mcrcon in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, colyseus or mcrcon?

Choose colyseus if you want the larger community (7,327 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mcrcon if its feature set, stack or Zlib licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.