head to head · open source

bevy vs entt

bevy has 48,364 GitHub stars, 4,858 forks, 3,418 open issues and last shipped today. entt has 13,139 stars, 1,117 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. bevy leads on adoption by 268% (48,364 vs 13,139 stars). bevy is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; entt is written in C++ under MIT. bevy has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, entt 9%. bevy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-development), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

bevy ★ 48K entt ★ 13K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

bevy entt
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust C++
Last push 2026-09-25 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 4.9K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick bevy if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full bevy profile →

pick entt if

  • You want the entt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and entt fits your workflow better

full entt profile →

About bevy

Bevy is a free and open source, data driven game engine written in Rust that gives developers a complete 2D and 3D feature set through an Entity Component System architecture, and it is aimed at Rust programmers building games and interactive applications who accept an early stage engine that ships breaking API changes roughly every three months.

read the full bevy overview →

About entt

EnTT is a header only, MIT licensed library written in modern C++ that provides a fast entity component system (ECS) for game programming and more, aimed at game, engine and data oriented developers who want the ECS architectural pattern without adopting a full framework.

read the full entt overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

godot vs bevy firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

bevy vs Godot bevy vs three.js bevy vs imgui bevy vs raylib bevy vs GDevelop bevy vs Babylon.js bevy vs libgdx bevy vs aframe bevy vs OpenRA bevy vs engine bevy vs MonoGame bevy vs ebiten

Frequently asked questions

Is bevy or entt more popular?

bevy has 48,364 GitHub stars and entt has 13,139. bevy has the larger community by that measure.

Are bevy and entt free?

Both are open source. bevy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and entt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between bevy and entt?

bevy is written in Rust and entt in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, bevy or entt?

Choose bevy if you want the larger community (48,364 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose entt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.