head to head · open source
ant-design vs ui-components
ant-design has 100,178 GitHub stars, 54,628 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ui-components has 1,967 stars, 96 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ant-design leads on adoption by 4,993% (100,178 vs 1,967 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; ui-components is written in TypeScript under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, ui-components 5%. ui-components was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (react), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ant-design | ui-components | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 100K | ★ 2.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-12 | 2026-11-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 55K | ⑂ 96 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ant-design if
- You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ui-components if
- You want the ui-components feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ui-components fits your workflow better
About ant-design
Ant Design An enterprise class UI design language and React UI library. [![CI status][github action image]][github action url] [![codecov][codecov image]][codecov url] [![NPM version][npm image]][npm url] [![NPM downloads][download image]][download url] [![][bundlephobia image]][bundlephobia url] [![][jsdelivr image]][jsdelivr url] [![Follow Twitter][twitter image]][twitter url] [![dumi][dumi image]][dumi url] [![FOSSA Status][fossa image]][fossa url] [![Issues need help][help wanted image]][help wanted url] [![LFX Active Contributors][lfx image]][lfx url] Changelog · [Report Bug][github issues url] · [Request…
read the full ant-design overview →
About ui-components
beUI Motion Component Library Animated components for React and Next.js. Copy the source, own the code. Website · Components · React Native · Changelog · llms.txt Interfaces that move with intent beUI brings motion to everyday product interfaces: buttons, navigation, menus, charts, AI conversations, and games. Built with React, TypeScript, Tailwind CSS, and Framer Motion, with live previews and copyable usage examples. Own the source. Install individual components into your app and change them to fit your product. Compose your interface. Combine focused primitives or start with a complete block. Make motion…
read the full ui-components overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ant-design or ui-components more popular?
ant-design has 100,178 GitHub stars and ui-components has 1,967. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.
Are ant-design and ui-components free?
Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and ui-components under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ant-design and ui-components?
ant-design is written in TypeScript and ui-components in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ant-design or ui-components?
Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (100,178 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ui-components if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.