head to head · open source

ant-design vs pts

ant-design has 99,540 GitHub stars, 54,718 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pts has 5,347 stars, 182 forks, 52 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 1,762% (99,540 vs 5,347 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; pts is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, pts 3%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K pts ★ 5.3K category Miscellaneous

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design pts
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 5.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 182
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick pts if

  • You want the pts feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and pts fits your workflow better

full pts profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About pts

Pts is an Apache 2.0 TypeScript and JavaScript library for visualization and creative coding, built for generative artists, designers, and developers who draw and animate geometry on canvas, in SVG, and with sound in the browser.

read the full pts overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida openpencil vs draw-io openpencil vs plasmic draw-io vs plasmic firecrawl vs godot firecrawl vs gdevelop godot vs home-assistant firecrawl vs monogame firecrawl vs sbox godot vs gdevelop godot vs monogame godot vs sbox firecrawl vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut godot vs cratedb godot vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs cratedb opencut vs cratedb

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs Figma-Context-MCP ant-design vs Tkinter-Designer ant-design vs pencil ant-design vs dicebear ant-design vs OpenPencil ant-design vs draw.io

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or pts more popular?

ant-design has 99,540 GitHub stars and pts has 5,347. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and pts free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and pts under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and pts?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and pts in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or pts?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,540 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pts if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.