head to head · open source
ant-design vs material-design-for-bootstrap
ant-design has 100,102 GitHub stars, 54,634 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped yesterday. material-design-for-bootstrap has 9,240 stars, 1,105 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 983% (100,102 vs 9,240 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; material-design-for-bootstrap is written in JavaScript under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, material-design-for-bootstrap 12%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| ant-design | material-design-for-bootstrap | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 100K | ★ 9.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-08 | 2026-03-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 55K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick ant-design if
- You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick material-design-for-bootstrap if
- You want the material-design-for-bootstrap feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and material-design-for-bootstrap fits your workflow better
About ant-design
Ant Design An enterprise class UI design language and React UI library. [![CI status][github action image]][github action url] [![codecov][codecov image]][codecov url] [![NPM version][npm image]][npm url] [![NPM downloads][download image]][download url] [![][bundlephobia image]][bundlephobia url] [![][jsdelivr image]][jsdelivr url] [![Follow Twitter][twitter image]][twitter url] [![dumi][dumi image]][dumi url] [![FOSSA Status][fossa image]][fossa url] [![Issues need help][help wanted image]][help wanted url] [![LFX Active Contributors][lfx image]][lfx url] Changelog · [Report Bug][github issues url] · [Request…
read the full ant-design overview →
About material-design-for-bootstrap
Bootstrap 4 UI KIT 700+ components, MIT license, simple installation. MDB is a collection of free Bootstrap templates, themes, design tools & resources. This content is for the previous 4th version of Bootstrap Newer version is available for Bootstrap 5. We recommend migrating to the latest version of our product Get 700+ material UI components, free hosting, super simple 1 minute installation & much more Get started Get Started in 1 minute Simple installation via .zip, npm or cdnjs. Install with MDBGO Free Hosting, WordPress support, custom domains, SSL support, free database, frontend & backend templates…
read the full material-design-for-bootstrap overview →
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Design & Prototyping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is ant-design or material-design-for-bootstrap more popular?
ant-design has 100,102 GitHub stars and material-design-for-bootstrap has 9,240. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.
Are ant-design and material-design-for-bootstrap free?
Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and material-design-for-bootstrap under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between ant-design and material-design-for-bootstrap?
ant-design is written in TypeScript and material-design-for-bootstrap in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, ant-design or material-design-for-bootstrap?
Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (100,102 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose material-design-for-bootstrap if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.