head to head · open source

ant-design vs material-design-for-bootstrap

ant-design has 99,601 GitHub stars, 54,708 forks, 1,066 open issues and last shipped yesterday. material-design-for-bootstrap has 9,247 stars, 1,108 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. ant-design leads on adoption by 977% (99,601 vs 9,247 stars). ant-design is written in TypeScript under MIT; material-design-for-bootstrap is written in JavaScript under MIT. ant-design has attracted 55% as many forks as stars, material-design-for-bootstrap 12%. ant-design was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ant-design ★ 100K material-design-for-bootstrap ★ 9.2K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ant-design material-design-for-bootstrap
GitHub stars ★ 100K ★ 9.2K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-03-27
Forks ⑂ 55K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ant-design if

  • You weight community size — 100K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ant-design profile →

pick material-design-for-bootstrap if

  • You want the material-design-for-bootstrap feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and material-design-for-bootstrap fits your workflow better

full material-design-for-bootstrap profile →

About ant-design

Ant Design (antd) is an enterprise class UI design language and React UI library that gives teams a full set of production ready React components, design resources and tooling for building web applications.

read the full ant-design overview →

About material-design-for-bootstrap

Material Design for Bootstrap is a free, MIT licensed UI kit that applies Google Material Design styling to the Bootstrap 4 front end framework, aimed at developers and designers building responsive, mobile first websites and applications.

read the full material-design-for-bootstrap overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K Home Assistant ★ 91K

Related comparisons

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs fleetbase open-design vs manim firecrawl vs openpencil firecrawl vs draw-io firecrawl vs plasmic firecrawl vs quant-ux firecrawl vs grida firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo

More Design & Prototyping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Design & Prototyping field.

ant-design vs open-design ant-design vs manim ant-design vs anime ant-design vs hyperframes ant-design vs daisyui ant-design vs tabler ant-design vs motion ant-design vs layui ant-design vs lottie-ios ant-design vs vant ant-design vs primitives ant-design vs mojs

Frequently asked questions

Is ant-design or material-design-for-bootstrap more popular?

ant-design has 99,601 GitHub stars and material-design-for-bootstrap has 9,247. ant-design has the larger community by that measure.

Are ant-design and material-design-for-bootstrap free?

Both are open source. ant-design is licensed under MIT and material-design-for-bootstrap under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ant-design and material-design-for-bootstrap?

ant-design is written in TypeScript and material-design-for-bootstrap in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ant-design or material-design-for-bootstrap?

Choose ant-design if you want the larger community (99,601 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose material-design-for-bootstrap if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.