head to head · open source

zinx vs agones

zinx has 7,764 GitHub stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. agones has 7,032 stars, 943 forks, 59 open issues and last shipped today. zinx leads on adoption by 10% (7,764 vs 7,032 stars). zinx is written in Go under MIT; agones is written in Go under Apache-2.0. zinx has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, agones 13%. agones was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (game-server, go, golang), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

zinx ★ 7.8K agones ★ 7.0K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

zinx agones
GitHub stars ★ 7.8K ★ 7.0K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-06-06 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 943
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick zinx if

  • You weight community size — 7.8K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full zinx profile →

pick agones if

  • You want the agones feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and agones fits your workflow better

full agones profile →

About zinx

Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.

read the full zinx overview →

About agones

Agones is an open source library for hosting, running and scaling dedicated game servers on Kubernetes, built for game developers, platform engineers and live ops teams that need multiplayer server capacity without bespoke cluster management.

read the full agones overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 182K Godot ★ 117K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

zinx vs Godot zinx vs three.js zinx vs imgui zinx vs bevy zinx vs raylib zinx vs GDevelop zinx vs Babylon.js zinx vs libgdx zinx vs MonoGame zinx vs Pumpkin zinx vs azerothcore-wotlk zinx vs colyseus

Frequently asked questions

Is zinx or agones more popular?

zinx has 7,764 GitHub stars and agones has 7,032. zinx has the larger community by that measure.

Are zinx and agones free?

Both are open source. zinx is licensed under MIT and agones under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between zinx and agones?

zinx is written in Go and agones in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, zinx or agones?

Choose zinx if you want the larger community (7,764 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose agones if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.