head to head · open source

agones vs LinuxGSM

agones has 7,036 GitHub stars, 944 forks, 59 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LinuxGSM has 4,903 stars, 863 forks, 405 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. agones leads on adoption by 44% (7,036 vs 4,903 stars). agones is written in Go under Apache-2.0; LinuxGSM is written in Shell under MIT. agones has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, LinuxGSM 18%. agones was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (dedicated-game-servers, game-server), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

agones ★ 7.0K LinuxGSM ★ 4.9K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

agones LinuxGSM
GitHub stars ★ 7.0K ★ 4.9K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Shell
Last push 2026-09-21 2026-08-07
Forks ⑂ 944 ⑂ 863
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick agones if

  • You weight community size — 7.0K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full agones profile →

pick LinuxGSM if

  • You want the LinuxGSM feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and LinuxGSM fits your workflow better

full LinuxGSM profile →

About agones

Agones is an open source library for hosting, running and scaling dedicated game servers on Kubernetes, built for game developers, platform engineers and live ops teams that need multiplayer server capacity without bespoke cluster management.

read the full agones overview →

About LinuxGSM

LinuxGSM is an MIT licensed, Shell based command line tool that deploys and manages more than one hundred dedicated Linux game servers, built for administrators who want to run their own multiplayer servers without spending hours on manual setup and upkeep.

read the full LinuxGSM overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 183K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 97K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

agones vs Godot agones vs three.js agones vs imgui agones vs bevy agones vs raylib agones vs GDevelop agones vs Babylon.js agones vs libgdx agones vs aframe agones vs MonoGame agones vs Pumpkin agones vs azerothcore-wotlk

Frequently asked questions

Is agones or LinuxGSM more popular?

agones has 7,036 GitHub stars and LinuxGSM has 4,903. agones has the larger community by that measure.

Are agones and LinuxGSM free?

Both are open source. agones is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LinuxGSM under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between agones and LinuxGSM?

agones is written in Go and LinuxGSM in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, agones or LinuxGSM?

Choose agones if you want the larger community (7,036 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose LinuxGSM if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.