head to head · open source
aframe vs zinx
aframe has 17,635 GitHub stars, 4,396 forks, 338 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. zinx has 7,765 stars, 1,262 forks, 96 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. aframe leads on adoption by 127% (17,635 vs 7,765 stars). aframe is written in JavaScript under MIT; zinx is written in Go under MIT. aframe has attracted 25% as many forks as stars, zinx 16%. aframe was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| aframe | zinx | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 18K | ★ 7.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-07-13 | 2026-06-06 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick aframe if
- You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick zinx if
- You want the zinx feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and zinx fits your workflow better
About aframe
A Frame is an MIT licensed JavaScript web framework built on top of three.js that lets anyone who can write HTML build browser based 3D, augmented reality and virtual reality experiences running on desktop, mobile and any WebXR capable headset.
read the full aframe overview →
About zinx
Zinx is a lightweight concurrent server framework written in Go, aimed at developers who want a small, readable TCP server skeleton they can study and customise rather than adopt a large opaque application framework.
More in Miscellaneous
Related comparisons
More Gaming projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.
Frequently asked questions
Is aframe or zinx more popular?
aframe has 17,635 GitHub stars and zinx has 7,765. aframe has the larger community by that measure.
Are aframe and zinx free?
Both are open source. aframe is licensed under MIT and zinx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between aframe and zinx?
aframe is written in JavaScript and zinx in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, aframe or zinx?
Choose aframe if you want the larger community (17,635 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zinx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.