head to head · open source

raylib vs entt

raylib has 34,860 GitHub stars, 3,309 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped yesterday. entt has 13,139 stars, 1,117 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. raylib leads on adoption by 165% (34,860 vs 13,139 stars). raylib is written in C under Zlib; entt is written in C++ under MIT. raylib has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, entt 9%. raylib was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (game-development), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

raylib ★ 35K entt ★ 13K category Miscellaneous

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

raylib entt
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 13K
License Zlib MIT
Written in C C++
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick raylib if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Zlib license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full raylib profile →

pick entt if

  • You want the entt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and entt fits your workflow better

full entt profile →

About raylib

raylib is an open source, Zlib licensed C programming library for building videogames and graphical applications, aimed at programmers who would rather write code directly than work inside a visual game engine editor.

read the full raylib overview →

About entt

EnTT is a header only, MIT licensed library written in modern C++ that provides a fast entity component system (ECS) for game programming and more, aimed at game, engine and data oriented developers who want the ECS architectural pattern without adopting a full framework.

read the full entt overview →

More in Miscellaneous

firecrawl ★ 184K Godot ★ 118K three.js ★ 116K ant-design ★ 100K open-design ★ 98K manim ★ 94K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs godot godot vs three-js firecrawl vs gdevelop firecrawl vs monogame godot vs imgui three-js vs imgui firecrawl vs sbox godot vs bevy firecrawl vs playwright firecrawl vs crawl4ai firecrawl vs novu firecrawl vs searxng firecrawl vs postiz firecrawl vs cap firecrawl vs openseo firecrawl vs keploy firecrawl vs home-assistant godot vs home-assistant three-js vs home-assistant firecrawl vs cratedb firecrawl vs gladys-assistant home-assistant vs opencut home-assistant vs frigate godot vs cratedb

More Gaming projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Gaming field.

raylib vs Godot raylib vs three.js raylib vs imgui raylib vs bevy raylib vs GDevelop raylib vs Babylon.js raylib vs libgdx raylib vs aframe raylib vs OpenRA raylib vs engine raylib vs MonoGame raylib vs ebiten

Frequently asked questions

Is raylib or entt more popular?

raylib has 34,860 GitHub stars and entt has 13,139. raylib has the larger community by that measure.

Are raylib and entt free?

Both are open source. raylib is licensed under Zlib and entt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between raylib and entt?

raylib is written in C and entt in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, raylib or entt?

Choose raylib if you want the larger community (34,860 stars) or its Zlib licence terms. Choose entt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.