head to head · open source

wtf vs webhook

wtf has 17,093 GitHub stars, 864 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. webhook has 12,134 stars, 875 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. wtf leads on adoption by 41% (17,093 vs 12,134 stars). wtf is written in Go under MPL-2.0; webhook is written in Go under MIT. wtf has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, webhook 7%. webhook was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (devops, go, hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wtf ★ 17K webhook ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

wtf webhook
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 12K
License MPL-2.0 MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-02 2026-09-04
Forks ⑂ 864 ⑂ 875
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wtf if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wtf profile →

pick webhook if

  • You want the webhook feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and webhook fits your workflow better

full webhook profile →

About wtf

WTF (also known as wtfutil) is a free, open source personal information dashboard that runs in the terminal, built for developers and technical people who want at a glance access to important but infrequently consulted data without leaving the command line.

read the full wtf overview →

About webhook

webhook is a lightweight, MIT licensed incoming webhook server written in Go that exposes HTTP endpoints which execute configured shell commands, built for developers and operators who want a push from GitHub, Bitbucket, Slack, or Mattermost to run a deploy or maintenance script on their own server.

read the full webhook overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

wtf vs kong wtf vs trivy wtf vs OpenTofu wtf vs jenkins wtf vs Pulumi wtf vs floci wtf vs argo-cd wtf vs sops wtf vs dagger wtf vs task wtf vs aws-cdk wtf vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is wtf or webhook more popular?

wtf has 17,093 GitHub stars and webhook has 12,134. wtf has the larger community by that measure.

Are wtf and webhook free?

Both are open source. wtf is licensed under MPL-2.0 and webhook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wtf and webhook?

wtf is written in Go and webhook in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wtf or webhook?

Choose wtf if you want the larger community (17,093 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose webhook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.