head to head · open source

Paperless-ngx vs Ceph

Paperless-ngx has 45,255 GitHub stars, 3,121 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ceph has 17,050 stars, 6,504 forks, 1,353 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Paperless-ngx leads on adoption by 165% (45,255 vs 17,050 stars). Paperless-ngx is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Ceph is written in C++ under a custom or non-standard licence. Paperless-ngx has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Ceph 38%. Paperless-ngx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Paperless-ngx ★ 45K Ceph ★ 17K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Paperless-ngx Ceph
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 17K
License GPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Python C++
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 6.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Paperless-ngx if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Paperless-ngx profile →

pick Ceph if

  • You want the Ceph feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Ceph fits your workflow better

full Ceph profile →

About Paperless-ngx

Paperless ngx is a community supported, GPL 3.0 licensed document management system written in Python that turns physical paperwork into a searchable, indexed online archive, and it is built for individuals, homelab operators and small teams who want to scan, index and archive their documents on infrastructure they control.

read the full Paperless-ngx overview →

About Ceph

Ceph is a scalable open source distributed storage system written in C++ and described as a platform for object, block, and file storage. It lives in infrastructure and operations storage solutions, where it provides a shared storage layer across distributed nodes rather than a single local disk.

read the full Ceph overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb elasticsearch vs meilisearch

More Storage Solutions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Storage Solutions field.

Paperless-ngx vs Immich Paperless-ngx vs Filestash Paperless-ngx vs Garage Paperless-ngx vs Storj Paperless-ngx vs Alarik Paperless-ngx vs Spinifex

Frequently asked questions

Is Paperless-ngx or Ceph more popular?

Paperless-ngx has 45,255 GitHub stars and Ceph has 17,050. Paperless-ngx has the larger community by that measure.

Are Paperless-ngx and Ceph free?

Both are open source. Paperless-ngx is licensed under GPL-3.0, and Ceph has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Paperless-ngx and Ceph?

Paperless-ngx is written in Python and Ceph in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Paperless-ngx or Ceph?

Choose Paperless-ngx if you want the larger community (45,255 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Ceph if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.