head to head · open source

floci vs wtf

floci has 24,500 GitHub stars, 2,645 forks, 130 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wtf has 17,093 stars, 864 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. floci leads on adoption by 43% (24,500 vs 17,093 stars). floci is written in Java under MIT; wtf is written in Go under MPL-2.0. floci has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, wtf 5%. floci was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (devops), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

floci ★ 25K wtf ★ 17K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

floci wtf
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 17K
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-02
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 864
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick floci if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full floci profile →

pick wtf if

  • You want the wtf feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and wtf fits your workflow better

full wtf profile →

About floci

Floci is a free, MIT licensed, open source local AWS emulator that gives developers, testers, and CI pipelines AWS shaped services on their own machine without a cloud account, an auth token, or paid feature gates.

read the full floci overview →

About wtf

WTF (also known as wtfutil) is a free, open source personal information dashboard that runs in the terminal, built for developers and technical people who want at a glance access to important but infrequently consulted data without leaving the command line.

read the full wtf overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs floci kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

floci vs kong floci vs trivy floci vs OpenTofu floci vs jenkins floci vs Pulumi floci vs argo-cd floci vs sops floci vs dagger floci vs task floci vs aws-cdk floci vs infracost floci vs webhook

Frequently asked questions

Is floci or wtf more popular?

floci has 24,500 GitHub stars and wtf has 17,093. floci has the larger community by that measure.

Are floci and wtf free?

Both are open source. floci is licensed under MIT and wtf under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between floci and wtf?

floci is written in Java and wtf in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, floci or wtf?

Choose floci if you want the larger community (24,500 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose wtf if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.