head to head · open source

wtf vs infracost

wtf has 17,093 GitHub stars, 864 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 16 days ago. infracost has 12,521 stars, 688 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. wtf leads on adoption by 37% (17,093 vs 12,521 stars). wtf is written in Go under MPL-2.0; infracost is written in Go under Apache-2.0. wtf has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, infracost 5%. infracost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (devops), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wtf ★ 17K infracost ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

wtf infracost
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 13K
License MPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-02 2026-09-09
Forks ⑂ 864 ⑂ 688
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wtf if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wtf profile →

pick infracost if

  • You want the infracost feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and infracost fits your workflow better

full infracost profile →

About wtf

WTF (also known as wtfutil) is a free, open source personal information dashboard that runs in the terminal, built for developers and technical people who want at a glance access to important but infrequently consulted data without leaving the command line.

read the full wtf overview →

About infracost

Infracost is an open source cloud cost intelligence tool, written in Go and licensed Apache 2.0, that estimates cloud spend and enforces FinOps policies for Terraform, Terragrunt, CloudFormation and AWS CDK before changes are deployed — built for engineers, platform and DevOps teams, FinOps practitioners, and AI coding agents.

read the full infracost overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd trivy vs opentofu kong vs sops uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

wtf vs kong wtf vs trivy wtf vs OpenTofu wtf vs jenkins wtf vs Pulumi wtf vs floci wtf vs argo-cd wtf vs sops wtf vs dagger wtf vs task wtf vs aws-cdk wtf vs webhook

Frequently asked questions

Is wtf or infracost more popular?

wtf has 17,093 GitHub stars and infracost has 12,521. wtf has the larger community by that measure.

Are wtf and infracost free?

Both are open source. wtf is licensed under MPL-2.0 and infracost under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wtf and infracost?

wtf is written in Go and infracost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wtf or infracost?

Choose wtf if you want the larger community (17,093 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose infracost if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.