head to head · open source
wtf vs infracost
wtf has 17,139 GitHub stars, 867 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. infracost has 12,605 stars, 701 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wtf leads on adoption by 36% (17,139 vs 12,605 stars). wtf is written in Go under MPL-2.0; infracost is written in Go under Apache-2.0. wtf has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, infracost 6%. infracost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (devops), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| wtf | infracost | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 17K | ★ 13K |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 867 | ⑂ 701 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick wtf if
- You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
- You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick infracost if
- You want the infracost feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and infracost fits your workflow better
About wtf
:rotating light: :warning: This project is going through some changes as we prepare for v1.0. This includes a rename from WTF to Tessera ! Stay tuned! :warning: :rotating light: WTF (aka 'wtfutil') is the personal information dashboard for your terminal, providing at a glance access to your very important but infrequently needed stats and data. Used by thousands of developers and tech people around the world, WTF is free and open source. To support the continued use and development of WTF, please consider sponsoring WTF via GitHub Sponsors. Are you a contributor or sponsor? Awesome! See here for how you can…
About infracost
Cloud cost intelligence for engineers, AI coding agents, and CI/CD. Infracost shows cloud cost estimates and FinOps best practices for Terraform, Terragrunt, CloudFormation, and AWS CDK — before changes are deployed . See costs in your terminal, your editor, your AI coding agent, or right in pull requests. The Infracost Dev toolkit Infracost meets engineers wherever they work with infrastructure code — the terminal, their editor, their AI coding agent, and their CI pipeline. Every entry point talks to the same engine, the same pricing data, and the same FinOps policies, so a check you set up once shows up…
read the full infracost overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is wtf or infracost more popular?
wtf has 17,139 GitHub stars and infracost has 12,605. wtf has the larger community by that measure.
Are wtf and infracost free?
Both are open source. wtf is licensed under MPL-2.0 and infracost under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between wtf and infracost?
wtf is written in Go and infracost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, wtf or infracost?
Choose wtf if you want the larger community (17,139 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose infracost if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.