head to head · open source

kong vs Pulumi

kong has 44,147 GitHub stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Pulumi has 25,694 stars, 1,431 forks, 2,419 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kong leads on adoption by 72% (44,147 vs 25,694 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; Pulumi is written in Go under Apache-2.0. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Pulumi 6%. Pulumi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K Pulumi ★ 26K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong Pulumi
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 26K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Lua Go
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 1.4K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick Pulumi if

  • You want the Pulumi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Pulumi fits your workflow better

full Pulumi profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About Pulumi

Pulumi is an open source infrastructure as code tool that lets teams define and deploy cloud infrastructure using general purpose programming languages instead of YAML, aimed at developers, platform engineers, and agents working across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud Platform, and Kubernetes.

read the full Pulumi overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops trivy vs opentofu uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger kong vs task kong vs aws-cdk kong vs infracost kong vs webhook

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or Pulumi more popular?

kong has 44,147 GitHub stars and Pulumi has 25,694. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and Pulumi free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Pulumi under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and Pulumi?

kong is written in Lua and Pulumi in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or Pulumi?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,147 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Pulumi if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.